|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homosexuality
(Sodomy)
It is not Love, it is Lust.
|
|
© Daniel Valles. May be reproduced for non-profit purposes
only, citing the author and source.
|
|
 |
Reader Response
Daniel Valles, 12/5/6 Updated 1/7/7
1st Email
[Jump to 2nd Email and reply]
A Reader wrote on 12/5/8:
I saw your email on a Christian site that
talked about homosexuality issues
and so I wonder what your thoughts are on same sex romantic love are
and if
you think this is a sin, where are we told this in the bible?
|
Dear Reader,
As we look at this subject, let us start by
defining the terms. Many times broad words are used when specifics
should be used. 'Love' is one of those words that has different
meanings based on the objects and circumstances. There are many
different kinds of 'love' in the world. There can be social or moral
love (Greek word, agape). An example of this would be you 'love'
being in the company or presence of your friends for the companionship,
fun, conversation, etc. In the same sense, you can 'love' someone
who has done you a favor. We 'love' our children and family because
of our instinct and connection to them. For the Christian, we love
God because He first loved us (I John 4:19, John 3:16), and gave His life
on the cross in payment for our sin. The Bible tells us to 'love'
(societal) our neighbor. 'Love' is also good-will toward people.
There are many fine charity and missions organizations that help others
out of love for their fellow human beings (Greek word, philanthrōpia).
There is also a 'love' of one's country: patriotism.
There is also a deeper love - ardent
friendship or a stronger attachment (Greek word, phileo). It means
to be a friend of, or to have an affection for (not in a sensual sense).
In John 21:7, the Bible mentions John as the "disciple whom Jesus loved
[agape]".
In the Bible, there is recorded the 'love' of David and Jonathan.
Many times they are wrongly used to excuse homosexual relationships.
There is nothing wrong with ardent, non-sensual, close friendships between
people of the same gender.
Let us look at the relationship of David
and Jonathan. 1 Samuel 18:1-3 says, "And it came to pass, when he
had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit
with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. And
Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's
house. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him
as his own soul." In short, these two men became close, ardent
friends. The words 'love, loved' in this passage both come from the
Hebrew word(s) aw-hab', aw-habe'. It means to have affection for
(sexually or otherwise); as a friend. Now some people would jump to
conclusions and assume that it was used in the sexual sense. But we
can clarify what 'love' they were talking of by II Samuel 1:26, in which
David says, "I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan: very
pleasant hast thou been unto me: thy love to me was wonderful, passing the
love of women." In this passage, the word 'love' is a different
word for love (Hebrew word, 'ahab). It simple means an "affection
(in a good or a bad sense)". David was saying that their friendship
was closer than even the affection (non-sensual) between a man and a
woman. Proverbs 18:24 also mentions this type of friendship: "A
man that hath friends must shew himself friendly: and there is a friend
that sticketh closer than a brother." There are friendships in
this world that can surpass even family, marriage, and paternal bonds.
So, does the Bible say anything about a
sensual relationship between people of the same gender? Absolutely.
Perhaps one of the best verses that explains several discrepancies of the
homosexual 'love' is Romans 1:27. The chapter mentions several ways
in which humanity has turned against God. One of them is same-gender
sex. "And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the
woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that
which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their
error which was meet." The very first thing that God plainly
establishes in this verse, by way of introduction, is that people are not
born homosexuals. The engaging in homosexual acts is a choice that
is chosen contrary to the way they were born. God never created
someone homosexual. It was a choice that they made. True,
there are many unfortunate young people today that are being indoctrinated
from kindergarten that homosexuality is 'normal' and 'ok'. Hogwash.
If I taught a child from kindergarten that they came from monkeys, they
would believe that too. Genesis 1:27 says, "So God created man in
his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created
he them." Pardon my French, but God made a male and a female,
and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what parts were made
for each other, and which ones weren't. The natural act of sex
between a male and female is a loving, face-to-face engagement.
Anything else cannot be called love - it is using another individual for
one's animal lusts.
That brings us to the second thing that
this verse clarifies: homosexuals do not 'love' - they "lust". There
is a world of difference between loving someone and lusting after someone.
Notice how the rich language of the King James Bible clarifies their
actions with the word "burned". The lust-driven cravings are far
from true love. Finally, the last part of the verse describes
the fallout of many homosexuals - they receive the results of their
actions. If they have chosen to go contrary to the way we were
created, then they shouldn't be surprised that they have such a large rate
of sexually-transmitted diseases, much lower life span, larger rates of
depression, suicides, high rate of bowel diseases, tuberculosis, and
hepatitis A and B. One almost does not need the Bible to tell you
that they are obviously doing something that is not healthy for them
physically or mentally. Any physician or mental health professional
should see that the symptoms show that something is wrong.
Are same-gender friendships fine?
Yes. Are same-gender lustful and sensual relationships sin?
Yes. It is ironic that the police and court systems still use the
biblical term 'sodomize' in certain crime descriptions. The reason
it is called that is because everyone knows for thousands of years we got
the term from the activity associated with the ancient cities of Sodom and
Gomorrah (II Peter 2:4-10). People today are called (by themselves,
as well) 'sodomites' because they engage in the same sinful behavior.
The word 'sodomites' is not a new term. The Bible uses it several
times. Every time that the Bible mentions sodomites, or sodomite
behavior, it is always in a negative connotation, and often listed as one
of the reasons why a particular judgment was given.
"But the men of Sodom were wicked and
sinners before the LORD exceedingly." Genesis 13:13
"And Judah did evil in the sight of the
LORD, and they provoked him to jealousy with their sins which they had
committed, above all that their fathers had done. For they also built them
high places, and images, and groves, on every high hill, and under every
green tree. And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did
according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out
before the children of Israel." I Kings 14:22-24
"And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did David
his father. And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed
all the idols that his fathers had made." I Kings 15:11-12
"And the remnant of the sodomites, which remained in the days of his
father Asa, he [King Jehoshaphat] took out of the land." I Kings 22:46
"And the king stood by a pillar, and made a covenant before the LORD,
to walk after the LORD, and to keep his commandments and his testimonies
and his statutes with all their heart and all their soul, to perform the
words of this covenant that were written in this book. And all the people
stood to the covenant. And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that
were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the
grove." II Kings 23:3, 7
Other specific verses are Genesis 18:20,
Genesis 19:1-29, Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13, I Timothy 1:8-11, and
Jude 6-7.
Reader, I do not know your situation, but
if you are in a homosexual relationship, or know of someone who is, there
is hope. In I Corinthians 6:9-11, Paul wrote to the church people in
Corinth and said that some of them (in their past) had been "effeminate"
and "abusers of themselves with mankind". But he said, "...such
were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are
justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God."
I Corinthians 6:9-11. The sin of sodomy needs to be repented of and
turned from.
I highly recommend that you read this
article entitled, "Hope For The Homosexual" (http://www.pawcreek.org/articles/endtimes/HopeForTheHomosexual.htm)
by Paw Creek Ministries.
Reader, I pray that God's and His Word will
help you understand this important subject, and use this information
(whether in your life or others) to restore a fellowship with God, serving
Him and not the lusts.
2nd Email
(posted 1/7/7)
The Reader wrote:
I think thats bad genralised thinking
that gays can only lust and not love.
Lust is a short burst of sexual energy. So it doesn't last and yet
if polls
are to be belived heterosexual marrage is now 50% least likely to
last and
gay unions that are blessed do. So clearly gay couples can and do
love and
some more than sadly many heterosexuals do. As for David and
Jonathan Im
afraid I can see a deep same sex romantic love clearly, we don't
know if
they were gay, but they can't have been heterosexual to 'ahab,
sexually
love eachother. And God blessed them.
romans 1 only has Paul mention same sex lust in
idolotry, how is romans 1 a case at all on same sex romantic love
then?
You say anything other than a man and a woman can not be regarded as
love
but animal lust, so why did God bless 1 man and many wives in the
OT?
Clearly marrage is not as clear cut as some would have us belive.
|
Dear Reader,
After all of the end-of-the-year traveling, I have finally been able to sit down
and respond to your emails.
I can tell from your responses that you read my email too quickly and that you
were not looking for information. It appears from your numerous postings on
other forums and groups (*****************, ******************, **************,
etc.) that you are more interesting in hearing responses which make you feel
better about your choice than whether it is a good choice or not.
It also appears that you are reading these posts and fastening on the most
ridiculous supports for your arguments. In your responses to my email, only half
of your questions and statements actually had something to do with the subject
at hand: whether same-gender sexual relationships were forbidden by God. The
cut-and-paste responses that you found on the web steering-off topic (such as
divorce and multiple wives) have no connection whatsoever.
I can also tell that you are (1) not a Christian (2) are completely ignorant of
what the Bible says, and are just repeating something about the Bible from
someone who was stretching to find some modicum of evidence to support their
choice to go against God's precepts. I am not really surprised though, Reader.
Romans 1:28, talking about all of those people who reject God via one form or
another, says, "even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God
gave them over to a reprobate mind..." You have made up your mind quite some
time ago that you are going to do whatever you want to do, regardless of what
God thinks. And God is saying that if that's what you want to think, then your
mind is going to believe the flimsiest and most outrageous lies. You will get to
the point where you are lying to yourself.
You said,
"I think thats bad genralised thinking that gays can only lust and not love."
Yep, you're absolutely true. I am glad you pointed that out. Good thing I did
not say that. As I illustrated in the second paragraph of my first email, there
is nothing wrong with people of the same gender having love, care, and concern
for each other. However, God makes it clear in His Word (as illustrated in the
third paragraph) that adding sensuality to a same-gender interpersonal
relationship is forbidden. Again, you read my first email too quickly. The
Hebrew word 'ahab' used to describe the relationship between David and Jonathan
*excludes* sexuality. It would be the same as saying they were 'not gay'.
You said,
"Lust is a short burst of sexual energy."
Wrong again. Lust is not hormones or adrenaline. Lust (shortly defined) is
wanting something that is forbidden. Most people associate it with sensual
activity because of the obvious (ie. adultery, pre-marital sex, same-gender sex,
pedophilia, etc.) However, Eve lusted after the forbidden fruit in the garden of
Eden. Achan lusted after the forbidden gold and silver in Jericho. The people of
Israel in the wilderness lusted after the pleasures of Egypt. The secular phrase
"caught with the hand in the cookie jar" describes how people pursue illicitly
things that they were forbidden to have. Lust is wanting anything that is
forbidden.
You said,
"So it [lust] doesn't last and yet if polls are to be belived heterosexual
marrage is now 50% least likely to last and
gay unions that are blessed do. So clearly gay couples can and do love and some
more than sadly many heterosexuals do."
Reader, I laughed when I read that. That has nothing to do with the subject
(you're reaching now), and not only is it an illogical statement, but it is also
false. (1) I majored at college in Advertising and Public Relations; I know how
incredibly easy it is to manipulate polls and surveys. Hence, they carry little
weight with me. (2) The Bible tells us numerous times that adultery and divorce
is forbidden as well. Your stats just go to show the power of lust. When someone
lusts after something they want, unless they are anchored in God's Word and
heeding what He says, they will pursue after it. (3) I found it incredibly
ironic that you were saying that sodomites are more dedicated to each other than
normal people. Even the secular world knows that to be laughably false.
Sodomites are the most promiscuous group on our planet! "Male sodomites with HIV
averaged 1,100 homosexual partners" ["The Gay Dilemma," Psychology Today,
January 1984, p. 56]. In his study of male homosexuality in "Western Sexuality:
Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times", M. Pollak found that "few
homosexual relationships last longer than two years, with many men reporting
hundreds of lifetime partners." Since you like popular opinion and polls so
much, how about this one: "only 2.7 percent claimed to have had sex with one
partner only" [Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven]. (4) You are blindly
assuming when you describe gay unions as 'blessed'. Only someone with a twisted
mind (reprobate mind) would consider a larger rate of sexually-transmitted
diseases, much lower life span, larger rates of depression, suicides, high rate
of bowel diseases, tuberculosis, and hepatitis A and B as a 'blessing'. Your
statements only exposes more of your biased hypocrisy.
You said,
"...romans 1 only has Paul mention same sex lust in idolotry, how is romans 1 a
case at all on same sex romantic love then?"
Again, you read my email too quickly, seeing only what you wanted to see.
Paragraph three, sentence three and four explained, "The chapter mentions
several ways in which humanity has turned against God. One of them is
same-gender sex." Romans 1:21-27 is a *list* of different ways that people have
turned away from God. vs.21-22: atheists and agnostics, people who reject God
outright. vs.23-24: Wicca, nature worshippers, New Age, idol worship. vs.25:
animists, evolutionists, spiritists. vs.26: lesbianism, feminism. vs.27:
sodomites. Sodomy is just one of the major ways in which people reject God. I
find it highly probable that you are not a Christian. Why? You do not want God
running your life and telling you what to do. You are an idol worshipper. You
want a Mr. Potato-Head god - one you can take the ears, eyes, and mouth off of.
You said,
"You say anything other than a man and a woman can not be regarded as love but
animal lust, so why did God bless 1 man and many wives in the OT? Clearly
marriage is not as clear cut as some would have us belive." Wrong again. If you
even read my email, the very first sentence of paragraph five says the complete
opposite. Again, I had to roll my eyes at your statement about wives. It has
nothing to do with supporting or negating the subject at hand, you just grabbed
at it because it sounded good. Reader, you really need to start reading God's
Word about what He says on subjects instead of cutting and pasting off of some
forum from some twit spouting off their own opinion. (1) Anyone who has read the
Bible knows that God condemns multiple wives. One instance is Deuteronomy 17:17
(talking about kings): "Neither shall he multiply wives to himself...". God gave
Adam one wife, and He also gave commandments about adultery, divorce, and
sodomy. (2) Again, you are ignorantly assuming God blessed multiple wives.
Abraham's multiple wives (Hagar) caused him nothing but grief, and it's result
was conflict in the Middle East to the present day. Solomon had the most wives
of anyone, and he warned his son repeatedly in Proverbs not to make the same
mistake, and he listed all of the heartaches that accompany it.
Reader, I say this with the utmost concern for you: your concepts of 'blessed'
reveal someone who has been lied to. Someone has been telling you that pursuing
the forbidden fruit will bring happiness and moral superiority. In fact, it has
made it's followers the most miserable, sick and dying lot of human beings on
our planet. Stop repeating their lies. Stop lying to yourself. Step back from
Satan's cookie jar. Satan has sold you a false love that is sending you to the
grave and to Hell. If you are tired of being lied to, pick up the Bible (I would
suggest King James Bible), and read the New Testament book of John and Romans.
You will find in those books a better definition of true love and how to obtain
it than you will ever find on some forum or hookup site.
The choice is yours. Will you listen to lies or to God?
Final Notes by the Editor:
The Reader's response to this last
letter was not worthy of posting. Basically, he continued to
refuse the Word of God. I could tell from his second response
that he was not interested in the truth, only in arguing.
Matthew 7:6 says, "Give not that which is holy unto the dogs,
neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them
under their feet, and turn again and rend you." The reason
I did respond is to provide an article and illustration to some of
the sodomite thinking and arguments, and to reinforce with Biblical
examples God's declaration on the matter.
|
|
Do
you have a question or comment? |
|
If you do, then send it to us! We would love to hear about it! We also welcome
comments or questions! |
|
|
|